Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have
toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users?
ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored
You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored.
Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
Any takers here?
I tend to think this isn't a very good idea. It's difficult for
applications to know whether a toast table will be created or not.
They should be able to just set the toast options and not worry.
The problem is where do we store the options?
How about in the reloptions of the main relation?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
