Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > >>> 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have > >>> toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users? > >>> ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored > > >> You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored. > >> Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch? > > > Any takers here? > > I tend to think this isn't a very good idea. It's difficult for > applications to know whether a toast table will be created or not. > They should be able to just set the toast options and not worry.
The problem is where do we store the options? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
