On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:14 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > pg_standby is useful and needs to be correct. And its existence as a > standard module is one of the things that has made me feel confident > about recommending people to use the PITR stuff. I'll be very annoyed if > it were to get pulled.
Although I am not advocating one position or another there are benefits to removing it. It would be nice to continue to enhance pg_standby without the limitations of the core release schedule. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
