On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:14 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > pg_standby is useful and needs to be correct.
My suggestion was designed to provide this. A misunderstanding. > And its existence as a > standard module is one of the things that has made me feel confident > about recommending people to use the PITR stuff. I'll be very annoyed if > it were to get pulled. If we cannot make it correct within core, then I will make it correct somewhere else, beta or not. Other than that, I have no wish to remove it from contrib. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
