On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Greg Stark <greg.st...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> So the real elephant in the room is that the existing explain code is >> not really designed to be extensible, configurable, or to be printed >> in different formats. > > These are implementation details ;-). Let's get a definition that > everyone can sign off on, and then worry about what has to be done > to the code to make it happen. Even if we end up throwing away and > rewriting all of explain.c, that's not *that* much code.
I'm actually not sure there's a whole lot to hash out... I was going to take a crack at writing some code. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
