On Wednesday 27 May 2009 13:25:14 Markus Wanner wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting "Peter Eisentraut" <pete...@gmx.net>: > > .. some of our tags are broken. Any conversion will either have to drop > > or repair some tags; see my previous posts to hackers about this. > > Can you please point me to that post? I didn't find it.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-12/msg01879.php > In what way do you consider the tags "broken"? The tag applies to different commits on different files. > (As CVS does not > guarantee any inter-file consistency, I don't think one can speak of > brokenness at all. Just because CVS doesn't guarantee it, it doesn't mean it's not broken. Otherwise, any possible random permutation of files would be a non-broken checkout by your definition. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
