Tom,
I think what this discussion is about is trying to gauge just what
amount of support we could give someone who insisted on dropping each
extension into a different schema. It's not really related to how
we track which objects belong to which extension.
Really, they're on their own.
Either we drop everything into a standard pg_extensions schema (which is
then programmatically part of the search path, like pg_catalog is) or we
don't install them to any particular schema and leave it up to the DBA
to work out any search_path issues on their own.
Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which
pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects
should go into a special schema.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
