Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which
> pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects
> should go into a special schema.
Well, we could certainly take that attitude and eliminate all this
hassle ;-). However, I think that more-flexible search path handling
might have other uses, so I don't see any reason not to think about it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
