On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Obviously we don't want to get into connecting to a web site, but we >> could probably come up with some other API for .so files to indicate >> which versions of PG they're compatible with. > > You mean like PG_MODULE_MAGIC?
Hey, how about that. Why doesn't that solve our problem here? [ thinks ... ] I guess it's because there's no guarantee that the function is installed on the SQL level with the signature that is appropriate on the C level. To fix that, I suppose we'd need to version the contents of the .sql file that installs the definitions, which gets back to the problem of building a general-purpose module facility. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
