Sorry I responded that quickly this early. I keep having additional thoughts.... "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> And especially, how could you have per-column targets? > Yeah, this would have to be done by table, not by column. If we had an optional two targets by column, we could pass any columns with such targets as a "step 0", before starting the tuple size checks. I think that makes sense, so I'm flip-flopping on that as a possibility. Now, whether that's overkill is another question. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
