On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 16:38, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> I have to say I'm not really impressed by the idea of removing things >>> from our documentation and replacing them with pages on the wiki. The >>> documentation is better-written and easier to navigate. > >> I agree in general, but information about version control isn't really >> part of the product. For example, if we switch from CVS to Git, and >> decide to pull the plug on the CVS server (hypotethically; in reality >> I'm sure we'd leave the CVS server around for historical purposes), the >> information becomes obsolete. > > If our docs are supposed to cover only information that's not subject > to change, they'll become quite short. I agree with Robert that moving > the info from the SGML docs to the wiki isn't an improvement.
I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but what about the removal of those two chapters suggested? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
