On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:08:28PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2009/11/26 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > >> I assume you are fine with the addition of some info about git, but > >> what about the removal of those two chapters suggested? > > > > I agree that we needn't try to cover material that's in the CVS manual. > > As somebody mentioned upthread, a sentence or two about our branching > > and tagging conventions would be a lot more useful. > > Here's an updated patch that does what I believe the consensus of this > thread was. Unless objected, I will commit this later tonight. Patch > now does: > > * As before, update cvs documentation and add git documentation > * Remove cvsup documentation > * Remove cvs internal documentation > * Add a link to appendix H (the source code repository) from the > general getting the source chapter. > > It does not add any proper documentation of exactly how we deal with > branches and tags at a useful level - this will come later. > > I would also like to propose that we actually backpatch this. At least > the addition of the git documentation and the update of the CVS > documentation. So we get this info out there. We don't normally > backpatch things like this though, so comments on that?
+1 for back-patching. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
