On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
In practice the reasonable engineering alternatives may just be to do
what KaiGai's patch does, or to do nothing. In that case I think a
good
argument can be made for the latter. Nobody has ever complained about
this from the field AFAIR; but we might get complaints if we disable
cases that used to work fine.
Maybe. The current behavior of allowing the rename but then breaking
queries certainly isn't awesome. I think if someone is willing to
implement a more careful check we should accept it.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
