Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Another option would be to call it "inherits_ndistinct", or something > like that, which seems a little more readable, but not great: I don't > think there's going to be any getting around the need to RTFM before > setting these parameters.
Well, the previously agreed-to syntax was SET STATISTICS DISTINCT. I don't see a problem with using "distinct" and "inherited_distinct" or something like that. "ndistinct" is probably not a good name to expose to non-programmers. The must-RTFM argument is fairly weak, though, since these are knobs that only advanced users would twiddle anyway. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers