Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> It's probably also worth noting that the reason I used DISTINCT
> originally is because it's already a keyword.
True.
It occurs to me that the pg_stats view already exposes "n_distinct"
as a column name. I wouldn't object to using "n_distinct" and
"n_distinct_inherited" or some such.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
