On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Another option would be to call it "inherits_ndistinct", or something >> like that, which seems a little more readable, but not great: I don't >> think there's going to be any getting around the need to RTFM before >> setting these parameters. > > Well, the previously agreed-to syntax was SET STATISTICS DISTINCT. > I don't see a problem with using "distinct" and "inherited_distinct" > or something like that. "ndistinct" is probably not a good name to > expose to non-programmers.
I like ndistinct because it makes the whole thing sound related to statistics, which it is. But I'll do it your way unless there are other votes. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
