Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Next question: what do we do if a direct-called function calls 
> > return_next()? That at least must surely take effect in the caller's 
> > context - the callee won't have anywhere to stash the the results at all.
> 
> Whatever do you mean by "take effect in the caller's context"?  I surely
> hope it's not "return the row to the caller's caller, who likely isn't
> expecting anything of the kind".
> 
> I suspect Tim will just answer that he isn't going to try to
> short-circuit the call path for set-returning functions.

FYI, I am excited PL/Perl is getting a good review and cleaning by Tim.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to