On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't see any strong argument for having a default for CREATE > FUNCTION. The original argument for having a GUC for DO was that > plpgsql wasn't built in; now that it is, I think a case could > be made for dropping default_do_language in favor of a hardwired > default.
+1 David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
