2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: > On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net>: >> > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't >> >> have a parameter called "default_language"? >> > >> > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION >> > is SQL. Should we implement that? >> > >> >> isn't it SQL/PSM ? > > No, but if you implement the SQL/PSM part, then those statements become > part of the "SQL" language. >
ok. i think so default_language could be potential risk for compatibility with standard. Pavel > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
