Greg Stark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I would prefer having the option, but removing it completely does at
least solve the bizarre inconsistency I've highlighted.
I don't see it as much of an inconsistency. The whole point of DO is
to be convenient, whereas CREATE FUNCTION is DDL for defining what
your database looks like and it should be well defined in perpetuity.
However it's also possible will write DO blocks into their application
code in which case it might be preferable not to have a
default_language GUC which would have to be set correctly for the code
to work.
Yeah, it's the possibility of scripts or functions with embedded DO
statements that makes me think we'd be better off without a setting for
this.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
