Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>> We have yet to reach a consensus on the name for this feature. I don't
>> think we have any really good candidates, but I like "DML WITH" best so far.
> Why can't we complain about the actual SQL statement the user issued?
> Like, say:
> INSERT requires RETURNING when used within a referenced CTE
We could probably make that work for error messages, but what about
documentation? It's going to be awkward to write something like
"INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RETURNING" every time we need to make a general
statement about the behavior of all three.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
