Bruce, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Ah, I now realize it only mentions "warm" standby, not "hot", so I just updated the documentation to reflect that; you can see it here:
Maybe the table below also needs an update, because unlike "Warm Standby using PITR", a hot standby accepts read-only queries and can be configured to not loose data on master failure.
Do we want to call the feature "hot standby"? Is a read-only standby a "standby" or a "slave"?
I think hot standby is pretty much the term, now. Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
