Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > * Listen / Notify rewrite. This is the only one of the remaining > > patches that is not marked as Ready for Committer, but I think it > > would be good if someone (probably Tom) at least took a look at it. > > I'm not sure if it's committable at this point, but we should at least > > try to provide some good feedback. > > I will look at this one. It'd be nice to get it in if at all possible, > because the existing listen/notify infrastructure won't play very nicely > with HS --- eg, inspecting pg_listener on the slave might yield the > false impression that some of the slave-side backends had active LISTENs > because of chance matches of PID.
Good point. Is pg_listener the only place we expose PIDs in heap files? I know we expose them in views but those are not affected by HS, I believe. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
