Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we
> should really try to deal with it.
Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it
tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
around here: the power stays on).
> * Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync. This is really two
> patches now, one of which is apparently to be backpatched.
This one (both parts) seems to have crashed and burned on unexpected
portability issues :-(. Do we have any expectation of being able to
fix it before alpha4?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
