Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Andrew Dunstan p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500: > > > > > Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them? > > Hi Andrew, > > The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which > was reinstalled and now they are used for different purpose. It was > planned before the April and I announced it long time ago. It > unfortunately happed and timing looks strange. And I did not find > replacement. > > I have replacement for nevada/x86 machine already, but I need to setup > it which is one item in my very long TODO list :(. Solaris 10 Sparc/x86 > and nevada sparc are covered at this moment.
I think we have to accept the inevitable result that Postgres support on Solaris is going to diminish over time. We certainly are going to get less support from Sun/Oracle, and one day the use of Postgres might even be obstructed on Solaris or void software support contracts. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
