On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:39:16 Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting > > for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been > > meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe > > someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we > > should really try to deal with it. > > Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it > tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather > around here: the power stays on). > > > * Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync. This is really two > > patches now, one of which is apparently to be backpatched. > > This one (both parts) seems to have crashed and burned on unexpected > portability issues :-(. Do we have any expectation of being able to > fix it before alpha4? The "Faster" part has burned as well? I just looked at the buildfarm and didnt see anything. Care to point anything out?
For the directory part I think we should aim for a more complete patch if I (or somebody else) can prove that its an issue (of what I am personally quite certain of). I think Greg just reverted the last patch (for 8.1). The latter for sure wont happen before weekend and I dont really see it bound for alpha4? Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
