Robert Haas escribió: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> > What ever happened to this patch? > > I think it's unclear that all of the best and worst cases have been > sufficiently tested and that the results are satisfactory. We have > everything from massive performance gains to no obvious benefit at > all, and it's very unclear that anyone has made a serious effort to > find a benchmark the worst-case scenarios. I think we should drop > this for now. *If* someone wants to put some work into more thorough > analysis for 9.1, we can revisit it then. +1 -- it's not like it hasn't been a problem all along. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
