Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Nobody suggested dismissing it. The point was that it hasn't been
> >> tested adequately to justify applying it now.
>
> > not sure what testing people want to get done though (there are a fair
> > amount of results and profiles in the thread)?
>
> Robert was complaining that the worst case hadn't been characterized
> adequately, which I agree with. We know it helps a lot on certain
> cases, but what's the downside?
Added to TODO list so we don't forget about it:
Considering improving performance of computing CHAR() value lengths
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
