On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the > query cancel problem. It really seems to me that this is the way > forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation > rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.
Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample? Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it in the conf file. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
