Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > > I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the > > query cancel problem. ?It really seems to me that this is the way > > forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation > > rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it. > > Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample? > Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it > in the conf file.
I asked about that last week and for some reason Simon didn't want it added and Greg Smith was going to get this corrected. Greg? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
