On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> As for updating the size recommendations, the text at >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server has been >>> beaten into the status quo by a number of people. Here's what might make >>> sense from there to insert into the docs, removing the bits referring to >>> older versions, rewriting a bit for manual tone, and noting the checkpoint >>> issues: > >> This is good text. I will incorporate it with slight copy editing if >> no one objects. > > Looks good to me too, although perhaps more than the single use of > "dedicated" is needed to remind people that these numbers are only > appropriate if the machine is not doing anything else than running > (one instance of) Postgres. Should we expend a whole sentence > on that?
IMHO that would be overkill, but that's just MHO. Other opinions? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
