On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> > >> > 99% of transactions happen in similar times between primary and standby, >> > everything dragged down by rare but severe spikes. >> > >> > We're looking for something that would delay something that normally >> > takes <0.1ms into something that takes >100ms, yet does eventually >> > return. That looks like a severe resource contention issue. >> >> Wow. Good detective work. > > While we haven't fully established the source of those problems, I am > now happy that these test results don't present any reason to avoid > commiting the main patch tested by Erik (not the smaller additional one > I sent). I expect to commit that on Sunday.
Both Heikki and I objected to that patch. And apparently it doesn't fix the problem, either. So, -1 from me. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
