Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 12:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?) >>> Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"? >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like >> its been through Google translate. > > Because it's not a maximum?
Yeah, min_wal_segments or something would make sense. It sounds about as good or bad as wal_keep_segments to me. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
