On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like > >> its been through Google translate. > > > Because it's not a maximum? > > Indeed. It would really be more like min_wal_segments, if we wanted to > name it that way.
Yeh, agreed: min_wal_segments. I realised while having dinner it was the opposite, so I'm pleased everybody else got there at same time. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
