Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like >> its been through Google translate.
> Because it's not a maximum? Indeed. It would really be more like min_wal_segments, if we wanted to name it that way. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers