On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing >>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it. So, +1 to >>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having >>> an operator until later. >> >> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all. >> "slice()" is OK by me. > > Will this be done for Beta 3?
You forgot to attach the patch. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
