On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK >>> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no? > >> It used to be => > > Nevermind, I *am* confused. Obviously time to knock off for the day; > my brain's fried.
Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
