On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Markus Wanner <mar...@bluegap.ch> wrote: > > However, note that the coordinator is designed to be just a message > passing or routing process, which should not do any kind of time > consuming processing. It must *coordinate* things (well, jobs) and react > promptly. Nothing else. >
so, merging this with the autovacuum will drop our hopes of having a time based autovacuum? not that i'm working on that nor i was thinking on working on that... just asking to know what the implications are, and what the future improves could be if we go this route -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
