Hi, On 07/15/2010 09:51 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > so, merging this with the autovacuum will drop our hopes of having a > time based autovacuum? not that i'm working on that nor i was thinking > on working on that... just asking to know what the implications are, > and what the future improves could be if we go this route
Not at all. Autovacuum should work exactly as before (seen from the outside, the implementation is a bit different). The coordinator is an async event processor. Events may origin from sockets, or may be driven by time, as is the case for autovacuum (up to something like a 1 second precision or something, I don't remember exactly). (There's nothing that needs to be merged with autovacuum. It already is merged, if you want). Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
