On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:16 AM, David Christensen <da...@endpoint.com> wrote: > On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM, David Christensen <da...@endpoint.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> I would propose to print instead: >>>>> >>>>> You are connected to database "rhaas" via local socket as user "rhaas". >>>> >>>> >>>> One minor quibble here; you lose the ability to see which pg instance >>>> you're running on if there are multiple ones running on different local >>>> sockets, so maybe either the port or the socket path should show up here >>>> still. >>> >>> Doh. Will fix. >> >> Something like the attached? > > > Looks good to me.
OK, committed. Thanks for the patch! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
