On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 7/23/2010 8:52 PM, David Fetter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:43:35PM +0300, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: >>> >>> Did I misunderstand the code? And if I didn't, why do we do this >>> differently? >> >> You mentioned in IRC that this was in aid of getting wCTEs going. How >> are these things connected? > > Currently, I'm trying to make wCTEs behave a bit like RULEs do. But if > every rewrite product takes a new snapshot, wCTEs will behave very > unpredictably. > > But because EXPLAIN ANALYZE does *not* take a new snapshot for every rewrite > product, I'm starting to think that maybe this isn't the behaviour we wanted > to begin with?
Where should I be looking in the code for this? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
