Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Personally, rather than sweat about what the exact definition of line
>> numbers is, I think we should be moving further in the direction of
>> being able to regurgitate source text to identify error locations.
> I basically agree with that; but on the other hand, in a large
> PL/pgsql function, you may have very similar-looking text in multiple
> places. So line numbers are good, too: but then you weren't proposing
> to remove those, I assume, just to augment them with additional
> information.
Right. I'm just suggesting that source text is better than line numbers
for exact position identification, so I don't see a lot of value in
preserving historical behaviors that change line numbers by one count
one way or another. If some of the PLs used zero-based instead of
one-based line numbers, we'd be looking to standardize that not cater to
their individual idiosyncrasies.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
