Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mié sep 15 14:52:36 -0400 2010: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > I think that would also solve a concern that I had, which is that > > we were starting to include relcache.h (and perhaps other headers > > as well, but that's the one that triggered it for me) a bit too > > liberally, so +1 from me. > > Unfortunately, what I proposed doesn't solve that for relcache.h, > although it does eliminate lock.h from almost everywhere and htup.h > from everywhere.
Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk of our headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including relcache.h in another header is not much of a problem. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
