Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 17/09/10 14:56, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> Why not use SubTransGetTopmostTransaction() ? >> >> This needs to work when the xid of a transaction is found in the >> MVCC data of a tuple for any overlapping serializable transaction >> -- even if that transaction has completed and its connection has >> been closed. It didn't look to me like >> SubTransGetTopmostTransaction() would work after the transaction >> was gone. > > You're right, it doesn't retain that old transactions. But it could > easily be modified to do so. I shall look into it. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
