Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually > confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk > of our headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including > relcache.h in another header is not much of a problem. OK, thanks for the clarification. With the structures all brought back together in a logical order, and the new comments in front of the structure declarations, do you think a summary at the top of the file is still needed in that header file? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
