Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Grabbing bigger chunks is always optimal, AFICT, if they're not > *too* big and you use the data. A single 64K read takes very little > longer than a single 8K read.
Proof?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
