On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
>> If so, let's change
>> the name.
>
> *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.

OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp_v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to