On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people? >>>> If so, let's change >>>> the name. >>> >>> *None* of these names are intuitive. So let's just go for consistency. >> >> OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp. > > Committed.
Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers