On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people? >>> If so, let's change >>> the name. >> >> *None* of these names are intuitive. So let's just go for consistency. > > OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.
Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
