On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself. > > For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you > want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version > of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?
No, not particularly. >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"? >> >> That, I like. > > Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch > later tonight, now is comute time. Sounds good. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
